Saturday 25 October 2014

Bystanders Notebook April 13, 1895.

*THE WORKER*
BRISBANE, APRIL 13, 1895.



Bystanders' Notebook.

THE NEW MAN AND POLITICAL FREEDOM.


It is seldom that a bushman sees a metropolitan paper, but I chanced to find a Courier of the 16th march the other day and read a very amusing article entitled the “New Man.” It is evident that the writer of same graduated with the late lamented Ananias. In commenting on the “new man” the Courier, with the usual coolness which generally characterises its utterances when perverting facts and indulging in misstatements, says: “The working man, from his own point of view at least, is the politically emancipated man.” Of course we are aware that misstatements of this description are historical. Now I assert that the workers of this colony are not politically free. Ever since the inception of so-called responsible government in Queensland the majority of the people have been disfranchised, and it is an indisputable fact that no person in any country can claim to be represented in the legislature who has not had, with the rest of the community, an equal voice in the selection of representatives. Yet, in view of the fact that hundreds of property holders in the colony posses a plurality of votes over less fortunate people, the Courier has the hardihood to inform us that we are politically free. Again the Courier goes on to say: “Now the new man has arrived, what has he done? The franchise has provided him with the opportunity to establish a record of beneficent deeds. But so far his career from this point of view is a failure, and the new movement has not yet given Australasian public life one politician who could be truly designated a statesman,”

The Courier very conveniently forgot to give its readers the meaning, as it is generally understood in Queensland, of the term “statesman.” In the common acceptation of the term a “statesman” is one who is an adept in the art of misleading the people, and is ever ready to prostitute his principle and pocket his patriotism with a view to self-advancement. In the event of being physically incapable from actively assisting and using his political position to bolster up tottering financial institutions, he will continue to hold a nominal position in a Ministry, take a trip to England, pocket a salary and do nothing in return. Queensland has produced several statesmen. The forward movement has produced none, nor is it likely to. It is satisfied to plod along in the future, as in the past, and content to stand sharply-defined before a wondering world, independent and watchful (for in its independence lies its strength), patient and courageous, political mediocrities if you will, but mediocrities who will endeavour to use the partial political freedom they possess as a lever to evolve order out of the present chaos, to substitute reality for the lifeless image which now bears the in-appropriate name of political freedom.

 JAS. BREEN.        Bulloo River.


* * *

THE LONGREACH DEPUTATION.

In the name of common sense what could have induced the deputation from the workers to wait on Nelson at Longreach to ask him to have the Electoral Act amened in order that the bushworkers could record their votes at the general elections! Did the deputation think for one moment that their request would be granted? What! To ask the first lieutenant of the unspeakable M'Ilwraith to amend an act which was made expressly to disfranchise the bushworkers! Verily, there must be little to do about Longreach when men can be found to waste their time over such folly. Stay! I may be unjust to the deputation. The object may have been to show the bushworkers that there is not the slightest prospect of their obtaining Justice while the present unprincipled gang is in power. If that was the object in view, then all I can say is that the deputation succeeded admirably.                                       

 T.B.    Toowoomba.  

* * *

THE PROBLEM OF THE FUTURE.

John Stuart Mill in his autobiography says respecting his conversion to Socialism: “The social problem of the future we considered to be how to unite the greatest liberty of action, with a common ownership in the raw material of the globe, and an equal participation of all in the benefits of combined labour. Education, habit and the cultivation of the sentiments will make a common man dig or weave for his country as fight for his country. Interest in the common good is at present so weak a motive in general, not because it can never be otherwise, but because the mind is not accustomed to dwell on it as it dwells from morning till night on things which tend only to personnel advantage. When called into activity, as only self-interest now is, by the daily course of life, and spurred from behind by the love of distinction and the fear of shame, it is capable of producing, even in common men, the most strenuous exertions as well as the most heroic sacrifices.

No comments:

Post a Comment